Success - Part One

I successfully defended my research proposal on Wednesday afternoon at Harrisburg University - Yippee!  Dr. Gould attended and (after some technical issues) we Skyped in Dr. Miller and Dr. Eagle.  The format went as explained and there are some revisions to make this week.  I was surprised by some of the feedback (too many instruments) and now need to think about how I can apply the feedback to my proposal.  During our executive session on Friday, Dr. Gould told me to just defend anything that I feel needs to stay as presented.  I need to remember that I can fight for particular aspects of my research that I feel strongly about, sine this is MY research, after all.  This is a helpful reminder as I move forward in the process.

Dr. Eagle suggested that I consider a teacher's perspective on whether or not creativity can be taught as I review my data.  If a teacher feels that relativity is simply innate, that assumption needs to be addressed before any meaningful development can occur.  This will most likely become an important part of my final outcomes and implications for the future.  As for now, I actually believe that I will get to the end of this process and am looking forward to the next steps!

Proposal update...Almost there....

Since my last post, my focus has been on combining my proposal into a cohesive framework while working out the details of the study.  I have investigated instruments, obtained author permissions, drafted qualitative questions, and added to the literature review.  A written lay summary and consent to participate are attached and ready to go to my sample one identified.  It truly feels like the process is moving!  I have received some constructive criticism and have made needed revisions - love that APA formatting......The entire document is 84 pages at this point and, while I know there is a great deal more ahead of me, I am amazed I have managed to write anything that long.  I know, I know.....it's not about the length, but for a MATH person, I think that's quite the accomplishment.  (virtual pat on the back, thank you....)  I do know that I have to add to the literature some more.  There is always new information coming out since creativity is a hot topic in the research right now!   

On Wednesday, I will be defending my research proposal to my committee.  The slides are ready (although copies need to be run and compiled still) and my thoughts seem (at least to me) to make sense.  I feel that I have a good handle on what I want to do and (more importantly) why this is important to education.  Now, I have to make sure I can make my committee feel my passion and understand my protocol. Oh, and speak s-l-o-w-l-y when I present.....More to come!

Work toward the proposal

While this quarter has been stressful at times, I have grown overall toward building a successful dissertation proposal.  This fall, I will need to revise, revise, revise with the help of my committee.  I now understand the individual pieces, but I feel I have repeated myself a bit too much through the help of copy and paste features of word processing.  In the immediate future, I will take a bit of a mental vacation away from this work while I open by building and send my own children back to school.  Before I know it, I will need to get back to the task at hand.  While I am thinking about it, I have made a list of some things I know I need to complete before I have something that is truly cohesive and presentable.    

• Search for specific literature that supports my opinions (based on personal experience) to make my arguments stronger and more scientific.  
• Creativity Theories
• Further time management studies
• Review Chapters 1-3 for overlapping texts.  Copying and pasting over the years may have led to duplicate wordings in multiple chapters. 
• Investigate general theories of creativity further.
• Revise Chapter 3 into a format that flows better for primarily quantitative work.
• Contact authors and obtain instruments.
• Develop qualitative questions for follow-up phase.

And...off we go!

Nearing the end

I have been working on the integration of my new sources with my initial literature review.  At the start of the process, I felt overwhelmed and a little lost, as if I couldn't clearly see my way.  Different directions at times seem contradictory and need clarity.

 
After some advice from peers and professors, I have reached a product that is satisfactory - for now.  However, in the process, I could feel the areas where I need additional research and where I am lacking empirical evidence.  This fall, I am looking forward to spending time integrating the proposal and solidifying my work.  Often within the coursework, I do not feel like I have the time to dedicate to this process fully and never quite get into the depth that I desire.  Soon, we will be focused on the important task with less additional work on our plates (or at least I hope that's where we will be....).  My final proposal will be more than simply satisfactory with continued advice and a clearer view of what's ahead.

  

Grant feedback

I received my initial feedback from my adviser regarding the Spencer Grant proposal and need to focus in a few areas as I move forward.

1.  Be aware of requirements - I knew what the difference was between a vitae and a personal statement, but then I followed the outline we were given (which did not have a spot for the vitae.)  Lesson learned - when in doubt, ask.

2.  Be more careful of citing statements - I thought this might come up eventually and here we are.  Ultimately, this is a matter of careful note taking and caution to cite more frequently.  When in doubt, cite.  I am at the point where some of my statements seem like common knowledge simply because of the amount of time I have spent with the topic.  I need to recall that my readers need to know whose ideas my statements were initially.

3.  APA formatting - When discussing a work written by multiple authors, I need to include all their names in the narrative.  Simple enough!

In addition, there were a few comments that pertain more to the flow of the text.  This will need to be revisited as I move forward into the official proposal (a bit frightening, I must say) this fall.  Even though I do not technically need to revise and resubmit the document, I am going to anyway and post my revisions here to complete the process.  Hmmmm...the main question is if I will have that part done before this weekend!  
    

Working on assignments

I am working simultaneously on the literature review, Spencer grant proposal, and my draft of Chapter Three (for another class - EDUC 835).  The Spencer grant contains several elements from both other assignments, but in different formats.  My thought this week is to complete the literature review and Chapter Three and then integrate these pieces into the proposal.  However, I am just overwhelmed by attempting to work on them at the same time.  It's hard to choose which one to focus on!  My plan....

1. Outline the format of the Spencer grant proposal, completing the pieces I can immediately (like the cover sheet, for example.)
2. Revise Chapter Three based on peer feedback.  (Thanks, Jeremy!)  Include more specifics on reliability and validity of assessments.
3. Add parts to grant proposal that are so far ready.  This will help me feel as though I accomplished something.
4. Work out the remaining kinks in the literature review.  The information is all there, but now I need to get it in the right format (around my three streams) and make it flow as one piece.
5. Choose critical parts of the literature review for the shorted version of the proposal.
6. Integrate the final proposal and add budget information to the budget worksheet.

Well, let's get moving, shall we?  More to come....

Finding my voice

I completed reading The Craft of Research and The Literature Review on the shores of New Jersey last week on a needed family vacation.  My Kindle in hand and the sound of the ocean as my soundtrack, I found both texts to be easy to read (although a bit dry at points) and chock full of interesting perspectives and advice on writing like a researcher.  The Craft of Research provided practical suggestions on word usage and I was encouraged especially by the advice on using active vs. passive voice.  I can still visualize the red ink on my ninth grade term papers, "You use passive voice too much.  Be more active in your prose."  At the time, and honestly, perhaps until now, I just never quite got it.  After completing this book, however, I can appreciate when active and passive voices are each acceptable and have learned that IT IS OKAY TO USE THE PASSIVE VOICE! Let's breathe a collective sigh of relief, shall we?  Booth, Colomb, and Williams speak of making sure sentences make sense and begin with "familiar information, preferably the main character" (Location 2519 in my Kindle - Not really sure how to properly cite THAT one).  While I will remain cautious of my overuse of passive verbs, I now take comfort that sometimes, what feels right - is right.

The shores of Lavallette, NJ

I also will take the planning and drafting advice given in this book - just write and don't get too caught up in the planning.  Sometimes, I fall into the trap of overplanning and need to just get moving.  The upcoming Spencer Grant proposal is a perfect example.... I have several pieces in multiple assignments and just need to assemble, tweak, add, and improve - while following the format.  The longer I wait to simply begin....the harder this task will be.

The Literature Review by Diana Ridley also proved to be worthwhile beach reading.   Two sections were especially helpful - critical writing and writer's voice.  I have a more solid understanding of what it means to be critical in my own writing.  As I write, I will refer to the pieces on pronoun and adjective use, organization, and evaluative strategies often.